Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    No, Louisiana is not accepting crypto for tax payments

    August 17, 2025

    Momentum builds as liquidity rises

    August 17, 2025

    High severity bug in Bitcoin Core affects 17% of full nodes

    August 17, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Ai Crypto TimesAi Crypto Times
    • Altcoins
      • Bitcoin
      • Coinbase
      • Litecoin
    • Blockchain
    • Crypto
    • Ethereum
    • Lithosphere News Releases
    X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Ai Crypto TimesAi Crypto Times
    Home » Solidity 0.6.x features: try/catch statement

    Solidity 0.6.x features: try/catch statement

    Michael JohnsonBy Michael JohnsonJuly 11, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email



    The try/catch syntax introduced in 0.6.0 is arguably the biggest leap in error handling capabilities in Solidity, since reason strings for revert and require were released in v0.4.22. Both try and catch have been reserved keywords since v0.5.9 and now we can use them to handle failures in external function calls without rolling back the complete transaction (state changes in the called function are still rolled back, but the ones in the calling function are not).

    We are moving one step away from the purist “all-or-nothing” approach in a transaction lifecycle, which falls short of practical behaviour we often want.

    Handling external call failures

    The try/catch statement allows you to react on failed external calls and contract creation calls, so you cannot use it for internal function calls. Note that to wrap a public function call within the same contract with try/catch, it can be made external by calling the function with this..

    The example below demonstrates how try/catch is used in a factory pattern where contract creation might fail. The following CharitySplitter contract requires a mandatory address property _owner in its constructor.

    pragma solidity ^0.6.1;
    
    contract CharitySplitter {
        address public owner;
        constructor (address _owner) public {
            require(_owner != address(0), "no-owner-provided");
            owner = _owner;
        }
    }
    

    There is a factory contract — CharitySplitterFactory which is used to create and manage instances of CharitySplitter. In the factory we can wrap the new CharitySplitter(charityOwner) in a try/catch as a failsafe for when that constructor might fail because of an empty charityOwner being passed.

    pragma solidity ^0.6.1;
    import "./CharitySplitter.sol";
    contract CharitySplitterFactory {
        mapping (address => CharitySplitter) public charitySplitters;
        uint public errorCount;
        event ErrorHandled(string reason);
        event ErrorNotHandled(bytes reason);
        function createCharitySplitter(address charityOwner) public {
            try new CharitySplitter(charityOwner)
                returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
            {
                charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
            } catch {
                errorCount++;
            }
        }
    }
    

    Note that with try/catch, only exceptions happening inside the external call itself are caught. Errors inside the expression are not caught, for example if the input parameter for the new CharitySplitter is itself part of an internal call, any errors it raises will not be caught. Sample demonstrating this behaviour is the modified createCharitySplitter function. Here the CharitySplitter constructor input parameter is retrieved dynamically from another function — getCharityOwner. If that function reverts, in this example with “revert-required-for-testing”, that will not be caught in the try/catch statement.

    function createCharitySplitter(address _charityOwner) public {
        try new CharitySplitter(getCharityOwner(_charityOwner, false))
            returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
        {
            charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
        } catch (bytes memory reason) {
            ...
        }
    }
    function getCharityOwner(address _charityOwner, bool _toPass)
            internal returns (address) {
        require(_toPass, "revert-required-for-testing");
        return _charityOwner;
    }
    

    Retrieving the error message

    We can further extend the try/catch logic in the createCharitySplitter function to retrieve the error message if one was emitted by a failing revert or require and emit it in an event. There are two ways to achieve this:

    1. Using catch Error(string memory reason)

    function createCharitySplitter(address _charityOwner) public {
        try new CharitySplitter(_charityOwner) returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
        {
            charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
        }
        catch Error(string memory reason)
        {
            errorCount++;
            CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter = new
                CharitySplitter(msg.sender);
            charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
            // Emitting the error in event
            emit ErrorHandled(reason);
        }
        catch
        {
            errorCount++;
        }
    }
    

    Which emits the following event on a failed constructor require error:

    CharitySplitterFactory.ErrorHandled(
        reason: 'no-owner-provided' (type: string)
    )
    

    2. Using catch (bytes memory reason)

    function createCharitySplitter(address charityOwner) public {
        try new CharitySplitter(charityOwner)
            returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
        {
            charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
        }
        catch (bytes memory reason) {
            errorCount++;
            emit ErrorNotHandled(reason);
        }
    }
    

    Which emits the following event on a failed constructor require error:

    CharitySplitterFactory.ErrorNotHandled(
      reason: hex'08c379a0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000116e6f2d6f776e65722d70726f7669646564000000000000000000000000000000' (type: bytes)
    

    The above two methods for retrieving the error string produce a similar result. The difference is that the second method does not ABI-decode the error string. The advantage of the second method is that it is also executed if ABI decoding the error string fails or if no reason was provided.

    Future plans

    There are plans to release support for error types meaning we will be able to declare errors in a similar way to events allowing us to catch different type of errors, for example:

    catch CustomErrorA(uint data1) { … }
    catch CustomErrorB(uint[] memory data2) { … }
    catch {}
    



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Michael Johnson

    Related Posts

    Join Us: EF Protocol Reddit AMA – August 29th, 2025

    August 15, 2025

    SIGN price soars 11% as Sign Foundation completes $12M token buyback

    August 13, 2025

    Fear & Greed Index hits 63 as Bitcoin, ETH, and SOL rebound

    August 7, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Don't Miss

    No, Louisiana is not accepting crypto for tax payments

    Coinbase August 17, 2025

    According to a screenshot posted to X, Louisiana residents “can now use bitcoin and Bitcoin…

    Momentum builds as liquidity rises

    August 17, 2025

    High severity bug in Bitcoin Core affects 17% of full nodes

    August 17, 2025

    NovaEx unveils zero-slippage trading suite

    August 17, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Our Picks

    AGII Develops Adaptive Intelligence Layers to Improve Web3 Workflow Precision

    August 15, 2025

    Imagen Network Enhances Content Discovery and Interaction with Grok AI Integration

    August 15, 2025

    Imagen Network Integrates Grok AI to Deliver More Personalized and Engaging Social Experiences

    August 14, 2025

    Imagen Network (IMAGE) Boosts User Engagement Using XRP for Instant Social Transactions

    August 13, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    Demo
    • Popular
    • Recent
    • Top Reviews

    Ethereum ETFs hit ATH, SPX6900 cools off, XRP outlook remains bullish

    June 18, 2025

    AERO price jumps 20% as it defies crypto downturn

    June 19, 2025

    relief rally or true trend reversal?

    June 20, 2025

    No, Louisiana is not accepting crypto for tax payments

    August 17, 2025

    Momentum builds as liquidity rises

    August 17, 2025

    High severity bug in Bitcoin Core affects 17% of full nodes

    August 17, 2025
    Latest Galleries
    [latest_gallery cat="all" number="5" type="slider"]
    Latest Reviews
    Demo
    Top Posts

    AGII Develops Adaptive Intelligence Layers to Improve Web3 Workflow Precision

    August 15, 20250 Views

    Imagen Network Enhances Content Discovery and Interaction with Grok AI Integration

    August 15, 20250 Views

    Imagen Network Integrates Grok AI to Deliver More Personalized and Engaging Social Experiences

    August 14, 20250 Views

    Imagen Network (IMAGE) Boosts User Engagement Using XRP for Instant Social Transactions

    August 13, 20250 Views
    Don't Miss

    No, Louisiana is not accepting crypto for tax payments

    Coinbase August 17, 2025

    According to a screenshot posted to X, Louisiana residents “can now use bitcoin and Bitcoin…

    Momentum builds as liquidity rises

    August 17, 2025

    High severity bug in Bitcoin Core affects 17% of full nodes

    August 17, 2025

    NovaEx unveils zero-slippage trading suite

    August 17, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    Demo
    Top Posts

    Bitcoin.com Wallet Earns WalletConnect Certified Badge! | by Bitcoin.com | Jul, 2025

    July 18, 202565 Views

    Justin Sun sues Bloomberg after report claims he owns 60% of TRON tokens

    August 14, 202538 Views

    SIGN price soars 11% as Sign Foundation completes $12M token buyback

    August 13, 202514 Views

    ProfitFarmers Review – Is it Legit? July 2025

    July 7, 20251 Views
    Don't Miss

    No, Louisiana is not accepting crypto for tax payments

    Coinbase August 17, 2025

    According to a screenshot posted to X, Louisiana residents “can now use bitcoin and Bitcoin…

    Momentum builds as liquidity rises

    August 17, 2025

    High severity bug in Bitcoin Core affects 17% of full nodes

    August 17, 2025

    NovaEx unveils zero-slippage trading suite

    August 17, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Our Picks

    No, Louisiana is not accepting crypto for tax payments

    August 17, 2025

    Momentum builds as liquidity rises

    August 17, 2025

    High severity bug in Bitcoin Core affects 17% of full nodes

    August 17, 2025
    Recent Posts
    • No, Louisiana is not accepting crypto for tax payments
    • Momentum builds as liquidity rises
    • High severity bug in Bitcoin Core affects 17% of full nodes
    • NovaEx unveils zero-slippage trading suite
    • Chelsea FC sponsor BingX tried to hide $40M hack behind ‘wallet maintenance’
    © 2025 - 2026

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.