Most supply chains won’t be ready for transparency

In 2026, the European Union will drop Digital Product Passports on global supply chains, and the companies that think this is just another compliance checkbox are in for a rude awakening. These passports force every manufacturer, logistics partner, and retailer to prove where a product came from, what it’s made of, how it moved, and its environmental impact. In this new era, spreadsheets, static QR codes, or ERP tweaks will no longer suffice. 

The cracks in global supply chains are about to be exposed. Decades of papered-over assumptions, self-reporting, and wishful thinking will collapse under regulatory scrutiny. Companies that fail to build a shared, tamper-proof infrastructure will struggle to meet regulatory demands. Blockchain, however, provides a practical way to capture multi-party, auditable data that can be trusted across borders and across companies – and it’s ready to handle the challenge.

Time is running out. Unless firms move fast, many will face a stark choice: radically overhaul their data infrastructure, or risk penalization and being shut out of key markets.

The reckoning is coming

Under the EU’s Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation, or ESPR, a central registry for Digital Product Passports is required by July 19, 2026. What was a future possibility is now the law. Delegated acts are rolling out now, and product categories like iron and steel, textiles, aluminum, batteries, and more have hard deadlines to report core data. By 2030, over 30 product categories will fall under the law.

At its heart, the DPP mandate is nothing less than a re-engineering of supply-chain data, demanding digital, machine-readable records for every stage of a product’s lifecycle. But here’s the rub: most companies haven’t built systems to produce tamper-evident, multi-party, auditable data. Today, supply-chain records are often siloed, maintained manually, or based on self-reported certifications that can’t be independently verified. Traditional ERP systems and cloud databases assume a single authority controls the data, leaving them unable to handle dozens of actors converging on the same record. Academic research has long warned of a “trust gap” between on-chain and off-chain data, showing that without proper infrastructure, compliance cannot be guaranteed. 

A recent whitepaper from the European Circular Tech Forum confirms this risk, highlighting how many industries still depend on outdated document-centric systems that can’t scale to meet the new requirements. Gaps in cross-sector material representation, machine-readable data, and multi-party verification leave companies exposed. The result is a compliance cliff where companies that assumed DPPs were “just extra paperwork” will face regulatory, financial, and reputational peril.

The danger isn’t risk, it’s complacency

Some will dismiss DPPs as bureaucratic overkill, argue that existing databases will suffice, or that blockchain is expensive, unproven, or risky. These concerns overlook the structural realities. These passports demand tamper-proof, auditable data shared across independent actors, verifiable without exposing sensitive information, and interoperable across borders; needs spreadsheet-based workflows and siloed databases can’t meet. The gaps are systemic, not minor, and treating DPPs as optional or cosmetic ignores the scale of the challenge.

Blockchain technology provides a practical way to overcome these structural gaps. By creating a shared, immutable record, blockchain ensures that data cannot be altered retroactively, even when multiple parties contribute information. Additionally, privacy-preserving techniques like permissioned chains, consortium frameworks, and zero-knowledge proofs enable verification while protecting sensitive data.

Of course, integration costs exist, but the cost of non-compliance — being locked out of EU markets, facing fines, or damaging reputation — is orders of magnitude greater. By providing a single source of truth that’s trusted across participants, blockchain directly addresses the data, trust, and compliance challenges that DPPs impose.

A defining moment for real-world blockchain

Blockchain, no longer a fringe experiment in supply chains, is already rapidly scaling to meet the demands of DDPs. The blockchain-based supply chain traceability market is projected to grow from around $2.9 billion in 2024 to $44.3 billion by 2034, driven by rising demand for transparency and secure verification. And active real-world deployments today are already demonstrating feasibility at scale.

Take VeChain, for example, which integrates IoT sensors, NFC tags, QR codes, and decentralized ledgers to trace products from raw materials to final sale. Its systems have been applied in more than 300 real-world cases, spanning agriculture, food, textiles, and luxury goods, providing immutable product histories verified by independent auditors. Or look at OpenSC, which uses blockchain to enable regulators and consumers to scan QR codes to verify sourcing, labor practices, and sustainability commitments.

These living deployments prove that blockchain solutions can deliver the security, coordination, and auditability necessary for a robust DPP regime. Companies don’t need to build from scratch; they need the will to adopt a system designed not for convenience, but for accountability, transparency, and resilience.

Wake up before the compliance cliff hits

Digital Product Passports aren’t just another soft green-washing measure. They are a regulatory hammer designed to force global supply chains to produce provable, shared, immutable truth about every product. However, most companies are unprepared, still relying on spreadsheets, siloed ERPs, and fragmented databases that will fail the moment regulators demand certainty.

Blockchain provides infrastructure built for this level of scrutiny. It creates immutable records that multiple stakeholders can trust, enables auditors to verify data without exposing trade secrets, and establishes a single source of truth across the supply chain. Real-world deployments already demonstrate its effectiveness, tracking products from raw materials to end-users and generating data that regulators, auditors, and consumers can rely on. Companies that move now can scale these systems in time, while those that delay will discover, too late, that their data systems collapse under the demand for proof.

The countdown has begun, and industry leaders must act. Those who invest in scalable, tamper-evident, interoperable infrastructure today will determine who survives or even thrives when transparency is no longer optional but mandatory.